Outsourcing

In one of my earlier posts, I had hinted that I wanted to write about outsourcing. I would quote from wikipedia which has this to say (at the time of my visit to the site)

"Outsourcing is subcontracting a process, such as product design or manufacturing, to a third-party company. The decision to outsource is often made in the interest of lowering firm costs, redirecting or conserving energy directed at the competencies of a particular business, or to make more efficient use of labor, capital, technology and resources"

I came across an article when I was browsing blogs about something which disturbed me a lot. Dealing with reproductive outsourcing (link). A search on the topic through up features such as medical tourism...The very fact that just to cut down on costs everything can be outsourced to developing countries disturbs me. I do not know how to even react to something like this.

I understand that developing countries do have lower costs of living and many things which would sell at a premium (including labour) in a developed country would be outsourced to cut down on costs and a multitude of other reasons which could be discussed for days...I would sum up the very foundation of the phenomenon of outsourcing from nature principle of balance and the basic theory of economics which requires that demand increases when supply falls and vice versa.

Outsourcing is after all a system. It is a system of doing business (or is it just that?) To simplify matters, I assume it is merely a system and hence would apply the logic that it has its own stages of inception, growth, maturity and decline. The inception of outsourcing was from the need of developed countries to cut down on their costs (and other miscellaneous reasons) Upon reaching the level of saturation or maturity; even outsourcing has to die or fade away...Looking at the future of outsourcing when this would happen , I realize that there would rise a state where costs incurred for outsourcing are no longer commensurate with its benefits, where outsourcing would yield no benefits to the outsourcing unit.
All through this blog post I use the word "cut down costs" because this is the one which we very easily tend to associate with the concept of outsourcing. I do not wish to restrict the meaning of the term "cut down costs" to merely monetary expense but would wish to stretch the blanket over a wide plethora of benefits that outsourcing units receive from it (focussing on core competencies, global reach..to name a few)

To attempt to find out in which stage of its life cycle, outsourcing is in, would not be easy since like all concepts, the concept of the life cycle which I have attempted to present here is not perfect, is vague and abstract as well. However we could always look at what would happen in each one of the stages of outsourcing which would go a long way in understanding the language of outsourcing better.

At the inception of the system of outsourcing was the need for entities in developed countries to gain an advantage over their competitors. The potential outsourcing customers (just thought of a name to make look better than calling them entities "blandly") had saturated the market (since the country was already at a developed stage) in order to go on, it had to work on three aspects. One, develop new markets; Two, work on value addition to the current markets; three, differentiate themselves from their competitors. We can see that outsourcing directly offered an option for the third aspect and indirectly contributed to the first and second one as well. The indirect contribution came from the fact that outsourcing created new jobs in developing countries, increased their standard of living and made them the new market for the potential outsourcing customer (actually, now their outsourcing customer). Post outsourcing, the outsourcing customer in the developed country was free to focus its attention on developing its core competencies providing value addition to the current markets and competitive advantage as well.

The subsequent stage is of growth which I personally think is where we stand is..I say this since maturity is a point in time whereas growth is a continous process and when we would have reached the point in time where maturity stands we would know that decline is just one step away. In this stage of growth, the outsourcing phenomenon branches out to different areas across the world, entering new areas in all spheres of business and trade. Potential outsourcing customers seek out newer and newer outsourcing service providers to create a competitive advantage. The stage of growth benefits many and increases the number of billionaires in the developing nations quite drastically. Forbes has this to say

Microsoft founder Bill Gates, the world's richest man for 13 years, and his pal Warren Buffett, who holds the No. 2 spot despite enormous charitable donations, are quickly losing ground to Mexico's most-monied man, Carlos Slim Helú. Helú's net worth is up an astonishing $19 billion this year--the single biggest one-year gain in a decade--and is now just $7 billion shy of Gates and $3 billion less than Buffett. After a 20-year reign, Japan is no longer Asia's top spot for billionaires: India has 36, worth a total of $191 billion, followed by Japan with 24, worth a combined $64 billion.
India's rich are also marching toward the top of our rankings. Brothers Mukesh and Anil Ambani, who split up their family’s conglomerate in 2005, join Lakshmi Mittal, who heads the world's biggest steel company, Arcelor Mittal, among the world’s 20 wealthiest. India now has three in the upper echelons, second only to the U.S.

For more on that, go here. So we see that outsourcing has in fact been a hugely equalizing factor, bringing in something which I started off this post with: balance.

Growth of outsourcing has seen phenomenal jumps and has lead to birth of even a few revolutionary systems such as "outsourced outsourcing", wherein, the outsourcing service provider further outsources it to another provider and merely acts as the bridge between him and the end customer. We could just go on discussing what growth actually means, in positive and negative terms as well. One of the them would also be reason for reason for the birth of reproductive outsourcing and medical tourism. I do not wish to discuss on the conflict between ethics and business on this post. Growth also means that the customer finds newer and newer zones to get his tasks outsourced to.

The level of maturity is marked by a stage where outsourcing would be about to hit a stone wall and there would no longer be any economies in indulging in it. At this stage, most customers would look for other options to substitute for the fall in the power of outsourcing. They would have to come up with strategically important ideas which could take them further and save them from the decline. Customers who would fail to do so, would not be able to take their business further and would suffer defeat as well. Hence, we could assume safely that many customers would exit as this level and would not wait for the decline to come about.

Maturity would actually mean that benefits from outsourcing are no longer as good as they used to be. However, in the final stage of decline; outsourcing would indeed be a burden on the resources of the customer and he would have no option but to discontinue it. Although, the end of outsourcing is not something we can truly visualize now. The end of the system of outsourcing would not mean that many service providers and customers would be out of business. It simply would pave way to the inception of a new system which promises further benefits for everyone involved. We may prophesize that the decline would most probably coincide with the end of developing countries (when, they too would have become developed countries). But there is no such thing as true balance and it is merely an attempt to balance all the way and hence a new system would rise from the ashes of the old and it would change the future as we know it. (I did get a bit carried away with those words I guess...)

Posted

Service oriented architecture (caution: very long and boring post)

Media_httpbp0bloggerc_ddgau
This is just an article I decided to write after attempting to learn what SOA is all about. I thought there would be many others who would like to know what Service oriented architecture is all about. No amount of queries on any of the search engines is going to explain what it is all about because: 1) Not many are clear about the concept 2) It is a concept 3) It is a concept which is still under development When I started off with SOA, a friend of mine said; I have checked out 10 different sites and they have 10 different explanations as to what SOA is. During my tenure as an auditor, I have had the opportunity of having used a fledgling SOA application which I never was a SOA in reality. The company had installed the system called it its homegrown ERP. Our IT department was all in awe of the technology. I thought then that the installation was plain crap since it took multiple and lengthy procedures to perform simple tasks. But now I understand that even though the system was plagued by teething problems and interface complexities, the underlying technology was what SOA was all about. The company had a system where there was a web based portal which could be accessed from anywhere and yet had an secure authorisation system which prevented unauthorised access. The website integrated the legacy system accounting system which it had based Tally combined with power of databases for storage of other information. The web based interface was basically made available to users and the users would merely have to click on links which offered a wide variety of business oriented services to the user. These services were for users from departments right from sales all the way back to the purchases. The sales page allowed its users to be updated of revenue on a daily basis, enabled zone wise, region wise and revenue generating unit wise segregation of sales. The purchases menu was linked to the inventory, goods receiving and quality control system. In effect, the system did provide everyone in the organisation with a webpage full of services to perform their tasks effectively. It was something like an EAI which had a common standardized interface. I did realise that were many comparisons which tried to put in SOA as an extended version of web services. Given below as some reactions to SOA from both the system as well as user's point of view Existing system's reactions: The system could react in two ways depending upon what the system is like. Considering the system is a legacy application which had been programmed on some old programming language, it would go about questioning the need for such a system. Most probably the system would not be in a position to appreciate the benefits that SOA would bring in, considering the limited artificial intelligence the legacy systems would offer and also the traditional mindset I would assume such a system would have. The existing system would have sufficed when transactions where not so dynamic, competition was not so cutthroat and management never cared what the IT guys did as long as it produced their traditional everyday reports. Things are changing fast, transactions are dynamic and ever changing, the environment changes so drastically, competition is cutthroat and management focuses on IT more than ever to make the business produce results. Considering a real life situation, Most traditional systems would have produced a few "not so customisable" reports, and would have been limited to batch processing regular clerical transactions. Doing exactly what they were told to do and nothing more. A change in the enterprise's requirements for something new would be so taxing on the system, since its adaptability to change would be minimal. I use the word "most traditional systems" since there are many systems which sometimes even work beyond what they are supposed to do and are in short ahead of their time. But they are limited and hard to come by. No matter what the nature of these traditional systems, they have reason to get excited; since SOA would ideally "link" them up with other applications, both traditional and conventional. The SOA would bring in its own technologies which would further enhance the way the whole company looks at IT "services" Assuming that most probably SOA is implemented with web services, the traditional apps now can even go online (what could be better...) SOA is the best thing since their last upgrade since it would invent a new way of utilising their "services" SOA would be renew their life since it would package their existing functionalities in a new manner All those mundane tasks would now be a part of an exciting service menu (ok, this statement doesn't mean much, but still..) If the system were in fact an ERP instead of a legacy application it would again look at SOA with hostility. "What does SOA have that I don't" would be what most ERPs ask. An ERP has a reason to get excited since: The SOA would allow it to network with the older applications, increased benefits from the older, more customized apps. More of the ERP's functions are now being put to use, its no longer a huge white elephant since the SOA puts them up on its menu. data from the legacy systems flows freely into the veins of the ERP (a utopian state?? I'm not to sure about it, still....) The ERP's complex menus and "T-codes" are enhanced by the fresh web interfaces. It can work peacefully in the background sure of the fact that the SOA would ensure that users get what they need User's reactions: From my interactions with many users of information services, there are broadly the following categories of users. Non technical users who do not care about the system as long as it does their mundane tasks (read technophobic) - Such persons would most probably initially resist the system, however as soon they get around to understanding a bit more of the new system, they would appreciate the fact that work has in fact become easier. Non technical users who understand technology to the extent to which it is required - would appreciate right from day 1 as to how easy work has become, chose an option from the menu and you are ready to go. They would be delighted to see that data from their legacy systems and other systems flows freely without boundaries and SOA delivers it to their desktop. Technical users would be in fact be updated regarding what SOA is all about and their interaction with the consultants implementing SOA would ensure that they are delighted about the change.

Filed under  //  ERP   SOA   business   concept   service oriented architechture   technology   theory   trend  
Posted

How to make nonsensical statements

"Life is such an empty piece of facts and happenings when there is no care and love involved"
- (insert some great name here, but the statement is mine which isn't too bad for a starter)

Now thats quite a revolutionary and bold statement. A statement much ahead of its times. An empty piece refers to the aspect that there it is not quite the complete picture and that there could be more to it than actually meets the eye (i.e. this statement)
The words "facts and happenings" provide a sense of boredom to the statement at same time serve the purpose of stressing on the issue that life could be viewed as a statement of truth and significant events during a specific timeline (which as we observed earlier, is only a portion of the entire aspect which does not meet the eye).
The words "happenings" also enables the reader to understand that each event of life in itself does not render completeness and it requires a multitude of situations and circumstances which would make it even remotely capable of being qualified to be called a slice of life.
The last leg of the journey which the statement seeks to lead us constitutes of enlighten us of the effects of the absence of the emotive aspects of care and love involved. We cannot even attempt to fathom the impacts on life when such aspects of life are lost since we are very much used to taking these for granted. The word care not only appears in the statement to compliment the component of love but also to enable the person to truly appreciate that love should be expressed in the words of care.
Now that you have read the nonsense about a statement which I wrote. I really think everyone can appreciate how I have tried to bring out the essence in which management books, great orators, boring teachers and others attempt to fool the masses. They merely beat around the bush with a single statement and helps them out since they are not at all required to tax their intelligence for actually radical statements for which otherwise they may have to answer for. The inspiration for this is purely attributable to the various abstract management concepts, presentations and speakers I've heard over the years.
Coming back to the where we left off yesterday, its not really that I have changed or anything around has changed; Just got myself an "attitude transplant" as calvin would say...And somehow my mind hasn't rejected it yet...I do not know when that would happen, but anyway let me enjoy it when it lasts. I have got a team building session tomorrow and nothing much happened today...

Filed under  //  business   discussion   humour   miscellaneous   nonsense   psychology   theory  
Posted